R v Albert & Anor (CO 27/2015) [2018] SCSC 8221 (12 July 2018)
The aggravating circumstances, including breach of trust and the value of stolen items, outweighed the mitigating factors for the first convict. The second convict's prior convictions and the nature of the offence warranted a custodial sentence.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8221
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; First Accused: Godfrey Albert; Second Accused: Terry Pointe
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2018
- Case Number
- CO 27/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and custodial sentence
- Legal Topics
- Aiding and Abetting, Housebreaking, Stealing From Dwelling House, Retaining Stolen Property, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Godfrey Albert
First Accused
Terry Pointe
Second Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for aiding and abetting housebreaking
- 2 Appropriate sentence for stealing from dwelling house
- 3 Appropriate sentence for retaining stolen property
Ratio Decidendi
The aggravating circumstances, including breach of trust and the value of stolen items, outweighed the mitigating factors for the first convict. The second convict's prior convictions and the nature of the offence warranted a custodial sentence.
Court Disposition
conviction and custodial sentence
Orders
- Godfrey Albert sentenced to 5 years imprisonment on Count 2 and 3 years imprisonment on Count 3, to run concurrently.
- Terry Pointe sentenced to 4 years imprisonment on Count 4, to run consecutively to all other terms of imprisonment imposed to date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment