R v Barreau (CO64/2017) [2018] SCSC 8340 (6 December 2018)
The amendment to the indictment cannot be granted as it would prejudice the accused, who has already conducted his defence on the original charges and would be unable to contest the new charges through cross-examination of prosecution witnesses.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8340
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Francis Barreau
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2018
- Case Number
- CO64/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Ruling on Prosecution's Motion to Amend Charges After Close of Prosecution Evidence But Before Formal Closure
- Outcome
- Prosecution's motion to amend charges refused
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Charges, Prejudice to Accused, Controlled Drugs, Procedure in Criminal Trials
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Francis Barreau
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Prosecution's Motion to Amend Charges After Close of Prosecution Evidence But Before Formal Closure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution should be granted leave to amend the charges by substitution and addition after leading evidence but before closing its case
- 2 Whether such amendment would prejudice the accused
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment to the indictment cannot be granted as it would prejudice the accused, who has already conducted his defence on the original charges and would be unable to contest the new charges through cross-examination of prosecution witnesses.
Court Disposition
Prosecution's motion to amend charges refused
Orders
- Case to proceed on the charges pleaded to by the accused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment