R v Bijoux (CO 63/2013) [2018] SCSC 8087 (22 February 2018)
The accused, Claudette Bijoux, falsely represented herself as a public servant and fraudulently obtained money from the complainant and his family under the pretext of securing citizenship, when in fact she was not employed by the Vice President's Office and the payments were not required for citizenship. The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the elements of personation, obtaining by false pretences, and stealing for the relevant counts, except for counts 4 and 6 where evidence was insufficient.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8087
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Claudette Bijoux
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2018
- Case Number
- CO 63/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction on counts 1,2,3,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24; Acquittal on counts 4 and 6
- Legal Topics
- False Pretences, Personation as Public Officer, Stealing, Fraud
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Claudette Bijoux
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused falsely represented herself as a public officer to obtain money by false pretences
- 2 Whether the accused obtained money from the complainant by fraud
- 3 Whether the accused stole money from the complainant under the pretext of obtaining citizenship
Ratio Decidendi
The accused, Claudette Bijoux, falsely represented herself as a public servant and fraudulently obtained money from the complainant and his family under the pretext of securing citizenship, when in fact she was not employed by the Vice President's Office and the payments were not required for citizenship. The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the elements of personation, obtaining by false pretences, and stealing for the relevant counts, except for counts 4 and 6 where evidence was insufficient.
Court Disposition
Conviction on counts 1,2,3,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24; Acquittal on counts 4 and 6
Orders
- The accused is found guilty and convicted on counts 1,2,3,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24.
- The accused is acquitted on counts 4 and 6.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment