R v FJ (CR 85/2019) [2020] SCSC 552 (17 July 2020)

R v FJ (CR 85/2019) [2020] SCSC 552 (17 July 2020)

The court found the complainant's evidence credible, clear, and consistent, supported by the social worker and medical evidence. The lack of DNA evidence did not create reasonable doubt, and hearsay evidence was inadmissible. The prosecution proved the charge beyond reasonable doubt.

Citation
[2020] SCSC 552
Parties
Prosecution: Republic; Accused: FJ
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
17 July 2020
Case Number
CR 85/2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
Conviction
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Evidential Burden, Hearsay Evidence, Corroboration, Child Victims
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Sexual Assault Evidential Burden Hearsay Evidence Corroboration Child Victims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Prosecution

FJ

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused sexually assaulted the complainant under section 130(1) and 130(2)(d) of the Penal Code
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Admissibility and sufficiency of evidence, including hearsay and lack of DNA evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the complainant's evidence credible, clear, and consistent, supported by the social worker and medical evidence. The lack of DNA evidence did not create reasonable doubt, and hearsay evidence was inadmissible. The prosecution proved the charge beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Conviction

Orders

  • The accused is convicted of sexual assault.