R v Fred (CO 39/2020) [2020] SCSC 618 (30 September 2020)

R v Fred (CO 39/2020) [2020] SCSC 618 (30 September 2020)

Given the absence of aggravating factors, the convict's guilty plea, and status as a first time offender, a fine is appropriate rather than immediate imprisonment.

Citation
[2020] SCSC 618
Parties
Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: Daniel Georges Fred
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
30 September 2020
Case Number
CO 39/2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Convict sentenced to a fine with default imprisonment; bail conditions removed; right of appeal granted.
Legal Topics
Possession of Controlled Drugs, Intent to Traffic, Sentencing
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecutor

Daniel Georges Fred

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for possession of a controlled drug (cannabis resin) with intent to traffic
  2. 2 Application of non-custodial sentence under Misuse of Drugs Act 2016

Ratio Decidendi

Given the absence of aggravating factors, the convict's guilty plea, and status as a first time offender, a fine is appropriate rather than immediate imprisonment.

Court Disposition

Convict sentenced to a fine with default imprisonment; bail conditions removed; right of appeal granted.

Orders

  • Fine of SR30,000 to be paid before end of October 2020
  • In default of payment, 6 months imprisonment