R v Fred (CO 39/2020) [2020] SCSC 618 (30 September 2020)
Given the absence of aggravating factors, the convict's guilty plea, and status as a first time offender, a fine is appropriate rather than immediate imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2020] SCSC 618
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: Daniel Georges Fred
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2020
- Case Number
- CO 39/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convict sentenced to a fine with default imprisonment; bail conditions removed; right of appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Controlled Drugs, Intent to Traffic, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
The Republic
Prosecutor
Daniel Georges Fred
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for possession of a controlled drug (cannabis resin) with intent to traffic
- 2 Application of non-custodial sentence under Misuse of Drugs Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
Given the absence of aggravating factors, the convict's guilty plea, and status as a first time offender, a fine is appropriate rather than immediate imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Convict sentenced to a fine with default imprisonment; bail conditions removed; right of appeal granted.
Orders
- Fine of SR30,000 to be paid before end of October 2020
- In default of payment, 6 months imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment