R v Gilbert (CS 34/1997) [1997] SCSC 9 (21 May 1997)
The accused's fingerprints at the scene, corroborated by his voluntary and truthful repudiated confession, and the recovery of stolen items, proved beyond reasonable doubt that he committed breaking and entering, theft, and arson.
- Citation
- [1997] SCSC 9
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; Accused: Francois Patsy Gilbert
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 1997
- Case Number
- CS 34/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction on all counts
- Legal Topics
- Arson, Breaking and Entering, Stealing From a Public Office, Confession Evidence, Fingerprint Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Francois Patsy Gilbert
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused broke and entered the Administration Office of the President's Office and committed theft and arson
- 2 Whether the confession and fingerprint evidence were admissible and sufficient for conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The accused's fingerprints at the scene, corroborated by his voluntary and truthful repudiated confession, and the recovery of stolen items, proved beyond reasonable doubt that he committed breaking and entering, theft, and arson.
Court Disposition
Conviction on all counts
Orders
- The accused is convicted as charged on all three counts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment