R v Laboudallon (Cr. S. 42/2020) [2020] SCSC 598 (7 September 2020)
The accused was sentenced based on the seriousness of the offences, the aggravating factors of violence and psychological harm to the victim, his prior conviction, and his drug dependency, balanced against his guilty plea, remorse, and cooperation. Sentences to run concurrently, with no remission, and recommendation for drug treatment.
- Citation
- [2020] SCSC 598
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: Yannick Laboudallon
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 7 September 2020
- Case Number
- Cr. S. 42/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Robbery With Violence, Drug Dependency, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecutor
Yannick Laboudallon
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused attempted to unlawfully cause the death of the victim
- 2 Whether the accused committed robbery with violence
- 3 Appropriate sentence considering aggravating and mitigating factors including drug dependency
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was sentenced based on the seriousness of the offences, the aggravating factors of violence and psychological harm to the victim, his prior conviction, and his drug dependency, balanced against his guilty plea, remorse, and cooperation. Sentences to run concurrently, with no remission, and recommendation for drug treatment.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentence imposed
Orders
- Eight years’ imprisonment for attempted murder
- Seven years’ imprisonment for robbery with violence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment