R v Maguerite (CO 63/2016) [2017] SCSC 848 (6 April 2017)

R v Maguerite (CO 63/2016) [2017] SCSC 848 (6 April 2017)

The absence of aggravating factors and the presence of significant mitigating circumstances justified the imposition of a fine rather than a custodial sentence.

Citation
[2017] SCSC 848
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Berard Maguerite
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
6 April 2017
Case Number
CO 63/2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and fined
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Mitigation, Misuse of Drugs
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Berard Maguerite

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for first offender under Misuse of Drugs Act 2016
  2. 2 Consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of aggravating factors and the presence of significant mitigating circumstances justified the imposition of a fine rather than a custodial sentence.

Court Disposition

convicted and fined

Orders

  • Fine of Rs45,000 for Count 1
  • Fine of Rs5,000 for Count 2