R v ML & Ors (CR 38/2019) [2020] SCSC 491 (16 April 2020)
The court imposed substantial custodial sentences on all three convicts, applying the totality principle to ensure the aggregate sentence reflected the overall criminality, while considering both aggravating and mitigating factors. The unprecedented seriousness, systematic nature, and impact on multiple child victims warranted consecutive sentences, but the court exercised discretion to reduce the total sentence for the first convict due to his guilty plea and to avoid an unduly harsh result. The court emphasized the need for deterrence, retribution, and protection of vulnerable children, and ordered additional monitoring and reporting measures.
- Citation
- [2020] SCSC 491
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; First Convict: ML; Second Convict: EL; Third Convict: JYN
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2020
- Case Number
- CR 38/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Extortion, Possession of Indecent Photographs, Prohibited Visual Recordings, Procuring by Threats, Trafficking in Persons, Sentencing Principles, Totality Principle, Mitigation and Aggravation, Mandatory Minimum Sentences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
ML
First Convict
EL
Second Convict
JYN
Third Convict
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for multiple counts of sexual assault and related offences against minors
- 2 Application of the totality principle in sentencing for multiple offences
- 3 Consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors in sentencing sexual offences against children
Ratio Decidendi
The court imposed substantial custodial sentences on all three convicts, applying the totality principle to ensure the aggregate sentence reflected the overall criminality, while considering both aggravating and mitigating factors. The unprecedented seriousness, systematic nature, and impact on multiple child victims warranted consecutive sentences, but the court exercised discretion to reduce the total sentence for the first convict due to his guilty plea and to avoid an unduly harsh result. The court emphasized the need for deterrence, retribution, and protection of vulnerable children, and ordered additional monitoring and reporting measures.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- First convict sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment (reduced from 44 years under totality principle); to be placed on Sexual Offenders Register; all interactions with children to be monitored; prohibited from social media; Attorney General to report Facebook accounts for removal.
- Second convict sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment