R v Morel (CO 24/2011) [2017] SCSC 268 (23 March 2017)

R v Morel (CO 24/2011) [2017] SCSC 268 (23 March 2017)

Given the convict's status as a first offender, family circumstances, and the lapse of time since the offence, a fine is appropriate and suspension of the driving licence is unnecessary.

Citation
[2017] SCSC 268
Parties
Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: John Morel
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
23 March 2017
Case Number
CO 24/2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and fined
Legal Topics
Driving Under the Influence, Sentencing
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecutor

John Morel

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for driving under the influence

Ratio Decidendi

Given the convict's status as a first offender, family circumstances, and the lapse of time since the offence, a fine is appropriate and suspension of the driving licence is unnecessary.

Court Disposition

convicted and fined

Orders

  • The convict is fined SR2,500 for driving under the influence of alcohol, payable within one month.
  • Right of appeal within 30 working days.