R v Mothe (CO 7/1999) [2000] SCSC 4 (31 March 2000)

R v Mothe (CO 7/1999) [2000] SCSC 4 (31 March 2000)

The accused committed an unlawful act (assault) which caused the deceased to fall and sustain a fatal skull fracture. The act was a cause of death within the meaning of section 192 and 199 of the Penal Code. Medical negligence or omission does not break the chain of causation. Intention to cause death is not required for manslaughter. The prosecution proved all elements beyond reasonable doubt.

Citation
[2000] SCSC 4
Parties
Prosecutor: Republic; Accused: Georges Mothe
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
31 March 2000
Case Number
CO 7/1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
Conviction
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Causation, Unlawful Act, Medical Negligence
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Prosecutor

Georges Mothe

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the accused committed an unlawful act causing the death of the deceased
  2. 2 Whether medical negligence or omission breaks the chain of causation
  3. 3 Whether intention (mens rea) is required for manslaughter under section 192 of the Penal Code

Ratio Decidendi

The accused committed an unlawful act (assault) which caused the deceased to fall and sustain a fatal skull fracture. The act was a cause of death within the meaning of section 192 and 199 of the Penal Code. Medical negligence or omission does not break the chain of causation. Intention to cause death is not required for manslaughter. The prosecution proved all elements beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Conviction

Orders

  • The accused is found guilty of manslaughter contrary to section 192 of the Penal Code and is convicted accordingly.