R v Nourrice (CO 46/2020) [2020] SCSC 662 (11 December 2020)

R v Nourrice (CO 46/2020) [2020] SCSC 662 (11 December 2020)

The court imposed a fine rather than a custodial sentence due to the convict's guilty plea, remorse, age, and entry into a rehabilitation program, considering these mitigating factors sufficient to avoid a harsher penalty.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] SCSC 662
Parties
Prosecutor: Republic; Accused: Stephan Marcus Nourrice
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
11 December 2020
Case Number
CO 46/2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction and sentence imposed
Legal Topics
Possession of Controlled Drugs, Sentencing, Mitigation
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Possession of Controlled Drugs Sentencing Mitigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Prosecutor

Stephan Marcus Nourrice

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for possession of a controlled drug under Section 8(1) of the Misuse of Drugs Act, 2016

Ratio Decidendi

The court imposed a fine rather than a custodial sentence due to the convict's guilty plea, remorse, age, and entry into a rehabilitation program, considering these mitigating factors sufficient to avoid a harsher penalty.

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence imposed

Orders

  • The convict is sentenced to a fine of SCR 5000. In default of payment, six months imprisonment.