R v Rose (CO11/2018) [2018] SCSC 8322 (18 November 2018)

R v Rose (CO11/2018) [2018] SCSC 8322 (18 November 2018)

Given the serious nature of the injuries, use of an offensive weapon, and the convict's history of aggression, a custodial sentence is warranted despite the plea of guilty and mitigating factors.

Citation
[2018] SCSC 8322
Parties
Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: Charles Paul Rose
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
18 November 2018
Case Number
CO11/2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Grievous Harm, Sentencing, Plea of Guilty
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecutor

Charles Paul Rose

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for acts intended to cause grievous harm under Section 219(a) of the Penal Code

Ratio Decidendi

Given the serious nature of the injuries, use of an offensive weapon, and the convict's history of aggression, a custodial sentence is warranted despite the plea of guilty and mitigating factors.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Convict sentenced to 4 years imprisonment
  • Time spent in remand to count towards sentence