R v Rose (CO11/2018) [2018] SCSC 8322 (18 November 2018)
Given the serious nature of the injuries, use of an offensive weapon, and the convict's history of aggression, a custodial sentence is warranted despite the plea of guilty and mitigating factors.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8322
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: Charles Paul Rose
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2018
- Case Number
- CO11/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Harm, Sentencing, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
The Republic
Prosecutor
Charles Paul Rose
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for acts intended to cause grievous harm under Section 219(a) of the Penal Code
Ratio Decidendi
Given the serious nature of the injuries, use of an offensive weapon, and the convict's history of aggression, a custodial sentence is warranted despite the plea of guilty and mitigating factors.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Convict sentenced to 4 years imprisonment
- Time spent in remand to count towards sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment