R vs Rose (CO 85.2011) [2014] SCSC 26 (28 January 2014)

R vs Rose (CO 85.2011) [2014] SCSC 26 (28 January 2014)

The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Daniel Rose was in possession of controlled drugs, with corroborated evidence and established chain of custody, and the accused's knowledge was demonstrated by his actions upon seeing the agents.

Citation
[2014] SCSC 26
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; First Accused: Daniel Rose; Second Accused: Michel Hortence
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
28 January 2014
Case Number
CO 85.2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Conviction
Legal Topics
Possession of Controlled Drugs, Trafficking in Controlled Drugs, Chain of Custody, Evidentiary Standards
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Possession of Controlled Drugs Trafficking in Controlled Drugs Chain of Custody Evidentiary Standards

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Daniel Rose

First Accused

Michel Hortence

Second Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Daniel Rose was in possession of controlled drugs (Cocaine and Cannabis)
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution established chain of custody and knowledge
  3. 3 Whether the evidence supports conviction beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Daniel Rose was in possession of controlled drugs, with corroborated evidence and established chain of custody, and the accused's knowledge was demonstrated by his actions upon seeing the agents.

Court Disposition

Conviction

Orders

  • Daniel Rose found guilty on counts 1 and 2 and convicted as charged.