Robert v Aglae (CS41/2018) [2018] SCSC 8324 (20 November 2018)
The Plaintiff has a valid and enforceable right of way over Parcel T.1932 based on the registered agreement, and the lack of prescribed form does not invalidate the easement; the Defendant and his agents must not interfere with this access.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8324
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Raja Robert; Defendant: Joseph Evans Aglae
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2018
- Case Number
- CS41/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for right of way granted; damages and costs denied.
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Land Registration, Servitude, Right of Way
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raja Robert
Plaintiff
Joseph Evans Aglae
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff has a legally valid right of way (easement) over Parcel T.1932 despite registration formalities
- 2 Whether the agreement dated May 2001 and registered in 2017 gives the Plaintiff a right of way that the Defendant cannot challenge
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff has a valid and enforceable right of way over Parcel T.1932 based on the registered agreement, and the lack of prescribed form does not invalidate the easement; the Defendant and his agents must not interfere with this access.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for right of way granted; damages and costs denied.
Orders
- Plaintiff has a motorable right of way/access on property T.1932.
- Defendant and his agents are ordered not to interfere with the said road access.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment