Lepathy v Labonte (CS 9 of 2020) [2023] SCSC 94 (3 February 2023)
The sum to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant is the value of the defendant’s ¼ share in Title No. T586 at the time of filing the case (27th January 2020), as required by Article 834 of the Civil Code of Seychelles Act, and not the nominal sum paid by the defendant to his transferor.
- Citation
- [2023] SCSC 94
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Regina Lepathy; Defendant: Andy Michel Labonte
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2023
- Case Number
- CS 9 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Co Ownership, Right of Pre Emption, Transfer of Land Share, Interpretation of Statutes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina Lepathy
Plaintiff
Andy Michel Labonte
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the co-owners are required to buy back the share at the price at which it was sold or at the value of the share at the time of the offer under Article 834 of the Civil Code of Seychelles Act.
- 2 Whether the defendant qualifies as a 'third party' under Article 834.
Ratio Decidendi
The sum to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant is the value of the defendant’s ¼ share in Title No. T586 at the time of filing the case (27th January 2020), as required by Article 834 of the Civil Code of Seychelles Act, and not the nominal sum paid by the defendant to his transferor.
Court Disposition
Claim partially allowed
Orders
- Plaintiff to pay defendant the value of the ¼ share in Title No. T586 as at 27th January 2020, with plaintiff to bear the costs and dues of the transfer.
- Each party to bear their own costs of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment