Repubic v Volcere (34 of 2005) [2005] SCSC 18 (10 November 2005)
The seriousness of the offences, as evidenced by the mandatory minimum sentences, the classification of the drugs, and the increasing prevalence of such offences, justifies remand in custody under Article 18(7)(b) of the Constitution. No extraordinary circumstances regarding the defendant's health were established to warrant release on bail.
- Citation
- [2005] SCSC 18
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Republic; Defendant: Jonathan Volcere
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2005
- Case Number
- 34 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- bail application dismissed; remand reaffirmed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Remand, Controlled Drugs, Seriousness of Offence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecutor
Jonathan Volcere
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the seriousness of the offence justifies remand in custody pending trial under Article 18(7) of the Constitution and Section 179 of the Criminal Procedure Code
- 2 Whether the defendant's health condition warrants release on bail
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the offences, as evidenced by the mandatory minimum sentences, the classification of the drugs, and the increasing prevalence of such offences, justifies remand in custody under Article 18(7)(b) of the Constitution. No extraordinary circumstances regarding the defendant's health were established to warrant release on bail.
Court Disposition
bail application dismissed; remand reaffirmed
Orders
- Defendant to remain in custody pending trial
- Bail denied
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment