Republic v Boux (47 of 2007) [2007] SCSC 114 (14 November 2007)
The court found no grounds to warrant special treatment for the accused and ordered that he be treated like any other remandee according to the law and regulations.
- Citation
- [2007] SCSC 114
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; Accused: Frederico Boux
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2007
- Case Number
- 47 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Bail and Special Treatment Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Application for special dietary privileges denied; accused to be treated as any other remandee.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Remand Conditions, Prisoner Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Frederico Boux
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Bail and Special Treatment Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be released on bail or transferred due to alleged assault and torture by prison officers
- 2 Whether the accused should be granted special dietary privileges while in detention
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no grounds to warrant special treatment for the accused and ordered that he be treated like any other remandee according to the law and regulations.
Court Disposition
Application for special dietary privileges denied; accused to be treated as any other remandee.
Orders
- Accused to be remanded at Central Police Station pending further investigations and hearing.
- Order to be served on Commissioner of Police, Superintendent of Prisons, and accused or his counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment