Republic v Jumaye (23 of 2002) [2005] SCSC 5 (29 May 2005)
The accused failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that she obtained the foreign currency from an authorized dealer or had permission from the Minister, as required by the Exchange Control Act. The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that she was in unauthorized possession of foreign currency. Strict liability applies and the statutory burden was not discharged.
- Citation
- [2005] SCSC 5
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; Accused: Sucilla Katherine Jumaye
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2005
- Case Number
- 23 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction
- Legal Topics
- Exchange Control, Unauthorized Possession of Foreign Currency, Burden of Proof, Strict Liability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Sucilla Katherine Jumaye
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was in unauthorized possession of foreign currency contrary to the Exchange Control Act
- 2 Whether the accused discharged the statutory burden of proving lawful possession or permission from the Minister
Ratio Decidendi
The accused failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that she obtained the foreign currency from an authorized dealer or had permission from the Minister, as required by the Exchange Control Act. The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that she was in unauthorized possession of foreign currency. Strict liability applies and the statutory burden was not discharged.
Court Disposition
Conviction
Orders
- The accused is found guilty as charged and convicted of unauthorized possession of foreign currency.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment