Bertin v Emmanuel (CS 02/2015) [2019] SCSC 1133 (22 January 2019)
The plaintiff is entitled to recover only the value of his proven financial contributions (SCR 51,500) plus interest, as the property remains solely owned by the defendant and the plaintiff's contributions were not gifts but investments made during cohabitation. No share of the property or its increased value is awarded.
- Citation
- [2019] SCSC 1133
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Roga Tien Louis Bertin; Defendant: Didienne Emmanuel
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2019
- Case Number
- CS 02/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff awarded restitution for financial contributions with interest; no share in property granted.
- Legal Topics
- Unjust Enrichment, Cohabitation, Property Contributions, Restitution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roga Tien Louis Bertin
Plaintiff
Didienne Emmanuel
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a share of the property or restitution for contributions made during cohabitation
- 2 Whether unjust enrichment occurred in favour of the defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is entitled to recover only the value of his proven financial contributions (SCR 51,500) plus interest, as the property remains solely owned by the defendant and the plaintiff's contributions were not gifts but investments made during cohabitation. No share of the property or its increased value is awarded.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff awarded restitution for financial contributions with interest; no share in property granted.
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff SCR 51,500 plus 4% interest per annum from 31 March 2014 until full settlement.
- Plaintiff awarded costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment