Denis v Bonnelame (CS 91/2015) [2017] SCSC 920 (13 September 2017)

Denis v Bonnelame (CS 91/2015) [2017] SCSC 920 (13 September 2017)

The plaintiff failed to prove all statutory conditions for acquisitive prescription, as her possession was not unequivocal, public, or adverse, and the defendant's tolerance was an act of neighbourliness, not a renunciation of ownership.

Citation
[2017] SCSC 920
Parties
Plaintiff: Rosy Denis; Defendant: Philippe Sinon Bonnelame
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
13 September 2017
Case Number
CS 91/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Plaint dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Acquisitive Prescription
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rosy Denis

Plaintiff

Philippe Sinon Bonnelame

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff acquired Parcel C954 by acquisitive prescription (adverse possession) under the Civil Code of Seychelles.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to prove all statutory conditions for acquisitive prescription, as her possession was not unequivocal, public, or adverse, and the defendant's tolerance was an act of neighbourliness, not a renunciation of ownership.

Court Disposition

Plaint dismissed with costs to the defendant.

Orders

  • Plaint dismissed with costs.