Soomery & Ors v Celestine (SCA 25 of 2011) [2013] SCCA 9 (3 May 2013)
The Appellant's late filing of heads of argument, without good cause, constitutes misconduct and justifies sanction. However, due to similar late filings in other cases during the session, the court imposed a lesser sanction: the appeal will not be heard in this session but deferred to the next, with costs awarded to the Respondent.
- Citation
- [2013] SCCA 9
- Parties
- Appellant: S. Soomery & Ors; Respondent: M. Celestine
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 3 May 2013
- Case Number
- SCA 25 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Procedural Compliance
- Outcome
- Appeal adjourned to next session; costs awarded to Respondent
- Legal Topics
- Late Filing of Heads of Argument, Court of Appeal Rules, Sanctions for Procedural Non Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. Soomery & Ors
Appellant
M. Celestine
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Procedural Compliance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the late filing of heads of argument by the Appellant should result in the appeal being struck out or sanctioned
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant's late filing of heads of argument, without good cause, constitutes misconduct and justifies sanction. However, due to similar late filings in other cases during the session, the court imposed a lesser sanction: the appeal will not be heard in this session but deferred to the next, with costs awarded to the Respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal adjourned to next session; costs awarded to Respondent
Orders
- Appeal not to be heard in this session
- Appeal to be listed for hearing in the next session
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment