Special Operations Security v Cadeau and Anor (SCA 3 of 2023; SCA MA 11 of 2023) [2023] SCCA 26 (4 July 2023)
The application for stay of execution was dismissed because, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Seychelles Court of Appeal Rules, 2005, as amended, the application should have been made to the Supreme Court in the first instance.
- Citation
- [2023] SCCA 26
- Parties
- Applicant: Special Operations Security; Respondent: William Cadeau; Respondent: Dominique Gerry
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 4 July 2023
- Case Number
- SCA 3 of 2023 ; SCA MA 11 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling by Single Justice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Employment Termination, Jurisdiction, Procedural Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Special Operations Security
Applicant
William Cadeau
Respondent
Dominique Gerry
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling by Single Justice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for stay of execution should have been made to the Supreme Court in the first instance under Rule 16 of the Seychelles Court of Appeal Rules, 2005, as amended
- 2 Whether the Applicant is entitled to a stay of execution pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for stay of execution was dismissed because, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Seychelles Court of Appeal Rules, 2005, as amended, the application should have been made to the Supreme Court in the first instance.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment