Financial Intelligence Unit v Forex Place Ltd & Anor (MC 77/2014) [2014] SCSC 461 (27 November 2014)
The property in question appears to be proceeds of crime, and the statutory requirements for granting interlocutory orders and appointing a receiver under the Proceeds of Crime Act have been satisfied.
- Citation
- [2014] SCSC 461
- Parties
- Applicant: The Financial Intelligence Unit; Respondent: Forex Place Limited; Respondent: Barclays Bank (Offshore) Seychelles Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2014
- Case Number
- MC 77/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application, Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders granted as prayed, ex-parte.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Orders, Asset Freezing, Receivership, Service Outside Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Financial Intelligence Unit
Applicant
Forex Place Limited
Respondent
Barclays Bank (Offshore) Seychelles Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application, Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property in question constitutes proceeds of crime
- 2 Whether interlocutory orders should be granted to prohibit dealing with the property
- 3 Whether a receiver should be appointed for the property
Ratio Decidendi
The property in question appears to be proceeds of crime, and the statutory requirements for granting interlocutory orders and appointing a receiver under the Proceeds of Crime Act have been satisfied.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders granted as prayed, ex-parte.
Orders
- Interlocutory order prohibiting Respondents or any person with notice from disposing of or dealing with the specified property.
- Appointment of Declan Barber of the Financial Intelligence Unit as receiver of the property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment