R vs Soopramanian (MC04.2014) [2014] SCSC 225 (3 July 2014)

The application does not meet the mandatory requirements of section 30B(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code and must be brought into conformity before the court can consider it.

Citation: [2014] SCSC 225
Parties: Applicant: The Republic; Respondent: Fabio Soopramanian
Court: Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Seychelles
Judgment Date: 3 July 2014
Case Number: MC04.2014
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Application / Preliminary Order on Application Compliance
Outcome: Application not in conformity; applicant ordered to comply
Legal Topics: Application Requirements, Section 30 B Criminal Procedure Code
Source Language: English

Criminal Procedure Application Requirements Section 30 B Criminal Procedure Code

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

The Republic

Applicant

Fabio Soopramanian

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Preliminary Order on Application Compliance

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application complies with section 30B(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code

Ratio Decidendi

The application does not meet the mandatory requirements of section 30B(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code and must be brought into conformity before the court can consider it.

Court Disposition

Application not in conformity; applicant ordered to comply

Orders

Applicant to bring application in conformity with section 30B(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code before seeking an order