Republic v Athanase (4 of 2008) [2010] SCSC 97 (19 October 2010)

Republic v Athanase (4 of 2008) [2010] SCSC 97 (19 October 2010)

Given the offence was a beach theft against a tourist and in line with established sentencing patterns, a custodial sentence is warranted. The accused's guilty plea and first offender status justify some leniency in the term, but not a suspended sentence.

Citation
[2010] SCSC 97
Parties
Applicant: The Republic; Respondent: Michel Athanase
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
19 October 2010
Case Number
4 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Judgment on Revision Application
Outcome
sentence enhanced
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Theft, Revision of Sentence, Tourism Related Crime
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Sentencing Theft Revision of Sentence Tourism Related Crime

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Applicant

Michel Athanase

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Judgment on Revision Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for theft was too lenient and should be revised
  2. 2 Whether a custodial sentence is mandatory for theft committed against tourists

Ratio Decidendi

Given the offence was a beach theft against a tourist and in line with established sentencing patterns, a custodial sentence is warranted. The accused's guilty plea and first offender status justify some leniency in the term, but not a suspended sentence.

Court Disposition

sentence enhanced

Orders

  • Sentence of 1 year imprisonment suspended for 3 years set aside
  • Substituted with 9 months imprisonment