Vel v Benjee (CS 84/2004) [2012] SCSC 54 (25 July 2012)
The plaintiff failed to adduce any evidence, including expert medical opinion, to establish that the defendants acted negligently or breached the standard of care required of medical professionals. There was no proof of actionable negligence or causation of injury by the defendants. The evidential burden was not discharged on a balance of probabilities.
- Citation
- [2012] SCSC 54
- Parties
- Plaintiff: VEL; First Defendant: BENJEE; Second Defendant: Government of Seychelles
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2012
- Case Number
- CS 84/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Standard of Care, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
VEL
Plaintiff
BENJEE
First Defendant
Government of Seychelles
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were negligent in the medical treatment and surgery performed on the plaintiff
- 2 Whether the plaintiff proved medical negligence on a balance of probabilities
- 3 Whether the second defendant is vicariously liable for the acts of the first defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to adduce any evidence, including expert medical opinion, to establish that the defendants acted negligently or breached the standard of care required of medical professionals. There was no proof of actionable negligence or causation of injury by the defendants. The evidential burden was not discharged on a balance of probabilities.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment