Cooperativa Muratori and Cementisti - C.M.C. di Ravenna, Italy v Department of Water Supply & Sewerage Management, Kathmandu & Anor [2025] SGHC(I) 16 (25 June 2025)
The parties' express designation of Singapore as the 'Place of Arbitration' constituted an agreement for Singapore to be the seat, conferring exclusive supervisory jurisdiction on Singapore courts. The Second Annulment Application in Nepal was a breach of the arbitration agreement. MB was not entitled to sovereign immunity as it was a separate entity engaged in a commercial transaction, not exercising sovereign authority. There were no strong reasons to decline enforcement of the parties' agreement. An interim anti-suit injunction was therefore granted to restrain MB from pursuing the Nepalese proceedings.
- Citation
- [2025] SGHC(I) 16
- Parties
- Claimant: Cooperativa Muratori and Cementisti - CMC di Ravenna, Italy; First Defendant: Department of Water Supply & Sewerage Management, Kathmandu; Second Defendant: Melamchi Water Supply Development Board
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application (summons) / Interim Application for Anti Suit Injunction
- Outcome
- Interim anti-suit injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunction, Arbitration Agreement Enforcement, Sovereign Immunity, Seat of Arbitration, Restraint of Foreign Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cooperativa Muratori and Cementisti - CMC di Ravenna, Italy
Claimant
Department of Water Supply & Sewerage Management, Kathmandu
First Defendant
Melamchi Water Supply Development Board
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Application (summons) / Interim Application for Anti Suit Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim anti-suit injunction should be granted to restrain foreign proceedings challenging the seat of arbitration decision
- 2 Whether the Melamchi Water Supply Development Board is entitled to sovereign immunity under Singapore law
Ratio Decidendi
The parties' express designation of Singapore as the 'Place of Arbitration' constituted an agreement for Singapore to be the seat, conferring exclusive supervisory jurisdiction on Singapore courts. The Second Annulment Application in Nepal was a breach of the arbitration agreement. MB was not entitled to sovereign immunity as it was a separate entity engaged in a commercial transaction, not exercising sovereign authority. There were no strong reasons to decline enforcement of the parties' agreement. An interim anti-suit injunction was therefore granted to restrain MB from pursuing the Nepalese proceedings.
Court Disposition
Interim anti-suit injunction granted
Orders
- MB restrained from pursuing or continuing to pursue Case No. 081-RE-0639 and/or Case No. 081-RE-1194 before the High Court Patan in Nepal until the final determination of OA 18.
- MB restrained from pursuing or continuing to pursue any proceedings in relation to the setting aside of or challenge to the arbitral tribunal's Seat Decision (ARB 331/22/BSB dated 20 August 2024) until the final determination of OA 18.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment