Lee Hiok Tng and Another v Lee Hiok Tng (in his personal capacity) and Others

Lee Hiok Tng and Another v Lee Hiok Tng (in his personal capacity) and Others

The prior judgment in the Consolidated Suit (Chao J), affirmed by the Court of Appeal and the Privy Council, determined that the 27 OUB shares were beneficially owned by Wee Kee Kongsi and that transfers by Nam were in breach of trust; that final adjudication operated as an estoppel by record and issue estoppel...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] SGHC 192
Parties
Plaintiff (executor and Trustee of the Estate of Lee Wee Nam): Lee Hiok Tng; Plaintiff (executor and Trustee of the Estate of Lee Wee Nam): Lee Hiok Woon; Defendant (in His Personal Capacity): Lee Hiok Tng; Intervener (beneficiary): Lee Siew Choon; Intervener (beneficiary): Lee Siew Hong; Intervener (beneficiary): Lee Siew Ngug
Court
General Division of the High Court
Jurisdiction
Singapore
Judgment Date
22 September 2000
Case Number
OS 571/1999
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (civil Dispute Concerning Trusts/estate and Share Ownership) / Judgment (grounds of Judgment)
Outcome
Application dismissed; Defendant's claim dismissed; proceedings characterised as an abuse of process
Legal Topics
Constructive Trust, Breach of Trust, Res Judicata / Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Presumption of Advancement, Indemnity for Costs, Partnership Assets, Share Ownership
Source Language
english
Trusts Probate Equity Civil Procedure Constructive Trust Breach of Trust Res Judicata / Issue Estoppel Abuse of Process +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lee Hiok Tng

Plaintiff (executor and Trustee of the Estate of Lee Wee Nam)

Lee Hiok Woon

Plaintiff (executor and Trustee of the Estate of Lee Wee Nam)

Lee Hiok Tng

Defendant (in His Personal Capacity)

Lee Siew Choon

Intervener (beneficiary)

Lee Siew Hong

Intervener (beneficiary)

Lee Siew Ngug

Intervener (beneficiary)

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons (civil Dispute Concerning Trusts/estate and Share Ownership) / Judgment (grounds of Judgment)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a 1963 gift from Nam to Tng effectively conveyed Nam's beneficial interest in 27 OUB shares held through Wee Kee Kongsi
  2. 2 Whether the transfer gives rise to the presumption of advancement
  3. 3 Whether Nam's estate or beneficiaries are estopped from claiming the portion of shares attributable to Wee Kee Kongsi (res judicata / issue estoppel)

Ratio Decidendi

The prior judgment in the Consolidated Suit (Chao J), affirmed by the Court of Appeal and the Privy Council, determined that the 27 OUB shares were beneficially owned by Wee Kee Kongsi and that transfers by Nam were in breach of trust; that final adjudication operated as an estoppel by record and issue estoppel preventing the Defendant (who had the opportunity to and did participate in earlier proceedings) from relitigating ownership or claiming a gift or indemnity; accordingly the Defendant's personal claim was dismissed and the shares remain Kongsi property with Nam's estate entitled to Nam's 8/21 interest and accretions.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; Defendant's claim dismissed; proceedings characterised as an abuse of process

Orders

  • The Plaintiffs' application and the Defendant's personal claim are dismissed with costs
  • The 27 OUB shares are the property of Wee Kee Kongsi; Nam's estate is entitled to an 8/21 share of the 27 shares with all accretions as declared by Chao J