Lee Pheng Lip Ian v Chen Fun Gee & 4 Ors
Section 42(2) of the MRA is to be treated as directory in its practical operation: neither a CC's late application for extensions nor the chairman's grants of extensions are invalidated simply for being late or for having inadequate stated reasons; the plaintiff failed to prove substantial prejudice from the delay; the leave application is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2019] SGHC 51
- Parties
- Plaintiff (registered Medical Practitioner): Lee Pheng Lip Ian; First Defendant — Chairman of the Complaints Panel: Chen Fun Gee; Second Defendant — Member of the Complaints Committee: Venkataraman Anantharaman; Third Defendant — Member of the Complaints Committee: Yeow Kok Leng Vincent; Fourth Defendant — Member of the Complaints Committee: Tan Jin Hwee; Fifth Defendant — Medical Council (smc): Singapore Medical Council
- Court
- General Division of the High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2019
- Case Number
- HC/OS 514/2018 ( HC/SUM 2032/2018,HC/SUM 3118/2018 )
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons for Judicial Review of Disciplinary Procedure Under the Medical Registration Act / Judgment (application Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Originating Summons No 514 of 2018 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extensions of Time Under Statutory Regime, Directory Vs Mandatory Statutory Provisions, Procedural Delay and Prejudice, Leave for Judicial Review, Scope of Review of Internal Administrative Time Extensions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Pheng Lip Ian
Plaintiff (registered Medical Practitioner)
Chen Fun Gee
First Defendant — Chairman of the Complaints Panel
Venkataraman Anantharaman
Second Defendant — Member of the Complaints Committee
Yeow Kok Leng Vincent
Third Defendant — Member of the Complaints Committee
Tan Jin Hwee
Fourth Defendant — Member of the Complaints Committee
Singapore Medical Council
Fifth Defendant — Medical Council (smc)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons for Judicial Review of Disciplinary Procedure Under the Medical Registration Act / Judgment (application Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s42(2) MRA is mandatory or directory
- 2 Whether non-compliance with s42(2) invalidates CC applications or chairman's grants of extensions of time
- 3 Whether the plaintiff suffered substantial prejudice from delay sufficient to invalidate proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Section 42(2) of the MRA is to be treated as directory in its practical operation: neither a CC's late application for extensions nor the chairman's grants of extensions are invalidated simply for being late or for having inadequate stated reasons; the plaintiff failed to prove substantial prejudice from the delay; the leave application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons No 514 of 2018 dismissed
Orders
- OS 514/2018 dismissed
- SUM 2032/2018 (discovery) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment