PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v BQW
Having assessed offence-specific factors as placing the conduct in the low to mid-range of Band 2 for digital penetration, set a starting point of 11 years 3 months per count, applied a discount for guilty plea to reach 10 years per count, ordered two of the sentences to run consecutively and one concurrent yielding...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] SGHC 136
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Public Prosecutor; Accused: BQW
- Court
- General Division of the High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2018
- Case Number
- HC/CC 91/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing (prosecution Appeal Filed)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on charges 1, 7 and 12; sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment on each; sentences for charges 1 and 7 to run consecutively and sentence for charge 12 to run concurrently with charge 1; aggregate imprisonment 20 years; no caning ordered; remaining charges taken into consideration; Prosecution filed...
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault by Penetration, Digital Penetration, Abuse of Trust, Sentencing Bands and Guidelines, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Prosecutor
Prosecutor
BQW
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing (prosecution Appeal Filed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for repeated digital penetration of a child under 14
- 2 Applicability and weight of aggravating and mitigating factors including abuse of trust, duration and planning
- 3 Application of sentencing bands in Pram Nair and Terence Ng
Ratio Decidendi
Having assessed offence-specific factors as placing the conduct in the low to mid-range of Band 2 for digital penetration, set a starting point of 11 years 3 months per count, applied a discount for guilty plea to reach 10 years per count, ordered two of the sentences to run consecutively and one concurrent yielding an aggregate 20 years, declined to impose additional imprisonment in lieu of caning and declined caning because offender is over 50.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on charges 1, 7 and 12; sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment on each; sentences for charges 1 and 7 to run consecutively and sentence for charge 12 to run concurrently with charge 1; aggregate imprisonment 20 years; no caning ordered; remaining charges taken into consideration; Prosecution filed...
Orders
- Convicted on charges 1, 7 and 12.
- Sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for each of charges 1, 7 and 12.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment