COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co., Ltd. v PT OKI PULP & PAPER MILLS & 2 Ors
The General Division has jurisdiction to hear and grant an interim stay of execution of an order made by the Court of Appeal where no appeal is pending and where statute (notably s 57 SCJA) contemplates concurrent jurisdiction to be exercised first in the General Division; the Court of Appeal's powers are appellate or incidental to appeals and do not exclude the General Division from granting interlocutory relief affecting enforcement of appellate orders absent relitigation barred by res judicata.
- Citation
- [2024] SGHC 273
- Parties
- Claimant: COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd; First Defendant: PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills; Second Defendant: COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (Europe) BV; Third Defendant: All other persons claiming or being entitled to claim damage, loss, expense, indemnity arising out of contact between “LE LI” (IMO No 9192674) and jetty/structure at Tanjung Tapa Pier on or about 31.05.2022
- Court
- General Division of the High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2024
- Case Number
- HC/ADM 50/2022 ( HC/SUM 2712/2024 )
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty in Personam (high Court) / Interim Application for Stay of Execution of Court of Appeal Order (hc/sum 2712/2024)
- Outcome
- Interim stay of execution of Court of Appeal order CA/ORC 34 granted
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Anti Suit Injunction, Court Jurisdiction, Interpretation of Rules of Court, Res Judicata
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd
Claimant
PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills
First Defendant
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (Europe) BV
Second Defendant
All other persons claiming or being entitled to claim damage, loss, expense, indemnity arising out of contact between “LE LI” (IMO No 9192674) and jetty/structure at Tanjung Tapa Pier on or about 31.05.2022
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Admiralty in Personam (high Court) / Interim Application for Stay of Execution of Court of Appeal Order (hc/sum 2712/2024)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the General Division of the High Court has jurisdiction to grant an interim stay of execution of an order made by the Court of Appeal
- 2 Whether the Court of Appeal retains jurisdiction to grant stays after an appeal has been finally determined
- 3 Proper construction of O 22 r 13 of the Rules of Court 2021 and ss 49, 53, 57, 58 and Seventh Schedule of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969
Ratio Decidendi
The General Division has jurisdiction to hear and grant an interim stay of execution of an order made by the Court of Appeal where no appeal is pending and where statute (notably s 57 SCJA) contemplates concurrent jurisdiction to be exercised first in the General Division; the Court of Appeal's powers are appellate or incidental to appeals and do not exclude the General Division from granting interlocutory relief affecting enforcement of appellate orders absent relitigation barred by res judicata.
Court Disposition
Interim stay of execution of Court of Appeal order CA/ORC 34 granted
Orders
- Interim stay of execution of CA/ORC 34 granted pending the hearing and final determination of OKI’s main application in HC/SUM 2712/2024, subject to conditions imposed by the Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment