XZG v XZH
Because the child was very young and unfamiliar with the Father and the Father lacked recent independent caregiving experience, the court ordered an incremental transition: supervised visitation at FAM@FSC (8 sessions) plus continuation and modest expansion of existing residence-based access pending a FAM report and court review; ancillary prayers for daily video calls and prohibitive third-party orders were declined for lack of benefit or evidence.
- Citation
- [2026] SGFC 25
- Parties
- Applicant Father: XZG; Respondent Mother: XZH
- Court
- Family Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2026
- Case Number
- FC/OAG 114/2025|HCF/DCA 153/2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Court Access Application (custody/access) / First Instance Judgment on Access Orders; Appeal Filed
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: supervised visitation ordered and interim expansion of existing access; other prayers refused or not ordered
- Legal Topics
- Supervised Visitation, Best Interests of the Child, Parental Responsibility, Access Review, Venue and Supervision of Access
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XZG
Applicant Father
XZH
Respondent Mother
Procedural Posture
Family Court Access Application (custody/access) / First Instance Judgment on Access Orders; Appeal Filed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant unsupervised access or require supervised visitation
- 2 Whether existing access should be expanded pending a supervised transition
- 3 Whether to order daily video calls
Ratio Decidendi
Because the child was very young and unfamiliar with the Father and the Father lacked recent independent caregiving experience, the court ordered an incremental transition: supervised visitation at FAM@FSC (8 sessions) plus continuation and modest expansion of existing residence-based access pending a FAM report and court review; ancillary prayers for daily video calls and prohibitive third-party orders were declined for lack of benefit or evidence.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: supervised visitation ordered and interim expansion of existing access; other prayers refused or not ordered
Orders
- Father to have supervised visitation at FAM@FSC once a week for eight sessions; parties may be required to attend programmes or assessment at FAM@FSC and a report is to be submitted to the Court with a review to be fixed thereafter
- Pending conclusion of supervised visitation and the Court's review: Father to continue weekly weekday access at the Child's residence for 2 hours on a mutually agreed day/time
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment