Beng Tiong Trading, Import and Export (1988) Pte Ltd v Maria Janda Achmad Bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Maria and Others
The court set aside the default judgment insofar as it affected the four applicants because, on balance, they demonstrated a defence with a real prospect of success on substantive points (nature of the beneficiaries agreement, possible condition precedent, and the applicability of CLPA s 35) and the overall justice of the case warranted relief despite unsatisfactory delay explanations; accordingly the judgment was varied under Order 13 r 8.
- Citation
- [2003] SGHC 232
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Beng Tiong Trading, Import and Export (1988) Pte Ltd; Defendant: Maria Janda Achmad Bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Maria; Defendant: Abd Rahim bin Awad bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias abd. Rahim Awad Wachdin; Defendant: Abd. Rachman bin Ali bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Abd. Rachman ali Wachdin; Defendant: Salim bin Hasan bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Salim Hasan W; Defendant: Ishak Bin Saad Bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Ishak Wachdin Be; Defendant: Quresh bin Muchsin bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Quraisj Wahidin S.H. alias Quresh Muchsin Wachdin; Defendant: Abubakar bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Abubakar Wahdin; Defendant: Abd Azis bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias abd. Aziz Wahdin; Defendant: Wachin bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Dr. H. Wachdin Achman; Defendant: Harith bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Harits Ahmad Wahdin; Defendant: Abd. Malik Muhammad Wachdin alias H. Abdul Malik Dr.; Defendant: Futum binti Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Futum; Defendant (trustee): The Public Trustee of Singapore; Defendant: Jak Alhadad & Co Pte Ltd
- Court
- General Division of the High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 8 October 2003
- Case Number
- Suit 1255/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contract/property (specific Performance and Declaratory Relief) / Summons in Chambers to Set Aside Default Judgment (order 13 R 8)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: order of court dated 19 July 1999 set aside insofar as it referred to the four applicants (1st, 9th, 10th and 12th defendants).
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Declaratory Relief, Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Conveyancing and Law of Property Act S 35, Service of Process, Condition Precedent
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beng Tiong Trading, Import and Export (1988) Pte Ltd
Plaintiff
Maria Janda Achmad Bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Maria
Defendant
Abd Rahim bin Awad bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias abd. Rahim Awad Wachdin
Defendant
Abd. Rachman bin Ali bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Abd. Rachman ali Wachdin
Defendant
Salim bin Hasan bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Salim Hasan W
Defendant
Ishak Bin Saad Bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Ishak Wachdin Be
Defendant
Quresh bin Muchsin bin Achmad Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Quraisj Wahidin S.H. alias Quresh Muchsin Wachdin
Defendant
Abubakar bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Abubakar Wahdin
Defendant
Abd Azis bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias abd. Aziz Wahdin
Defendant
Wachin bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Dr. H. Wachdin Achman
Defendant
Harith bin Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Harits Ahmad Wahdin
Defendant
Abd. Malik Muhammad Wachdin alias H. Abdul Malik Dr.
Defendant
Futum binti Achmad bin Abdullah Wachdin Basharahil alias Futum
Defendant
The Public Trustee of Singapore
Defendant (trustee)
Jak Alhadad & Co Pte Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract/property (specific Performance and Declaratory Relief) / Summons in Chambers to Set Aside Default Judgment (order 13 R 8)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment entered in favour of the plaintiffs should be set aside under Order 13 r 8
- 2 Whether the beneficiaries agreement was a contract for sale of estate properties or for conveyance of personal inheritance rights
- 3 Whether the proposed appointment of private trustees was a condition precedent to completion and whether failure of that mechanism invalidated the agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The court set aside the default judgment insofar as it affected the four applicants because, on balance, they demonstrated a defence with a real prospect of success on substantive points (nature of the beneficiaries agreement, possible condition precedent, and the applicability of CLPA s 35) and the overall justice of the case warranted relief despite unsatisfactory delay explanations; accordingly the judgment was varied under Order 13 r 8.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: order of court dated 19 July 1999 set aside insofar as it referred to the four applicants (1st, 9th, 10th and 12th defendants).
Orders
- Order of court dated 19 July 1999 set aside to the extent that references in paragraphs 1, 2 and 5 thereto are made to the 1st, 9th, 10th and 12th defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment