DKB v DKC [2025] SGHC(I) 26 (12 November 2025)

DKB v DKC [2025] SGHC(I) 26 (12 November 2025)

It is undesirable to determine proceedings on assumed facts without factual findings, especially when underlying facts are uncertain and legal issues are novel; separate questions should not be ordered.

Citation
[2025] SGHC(I) 26
Parties
Claimant: DKB; Defendant: DKC
Jurisdiction
Singapore
Judgment Date
12 November 2025
Procedural Posture
Originating Application / Summons to Set Aside Leave to Enforce Arbitral Award
Outcome
application for separate questions refused
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Public Policy, Sanctions, Separate Questions, Preliminary Hearings
Civil Procedure International Arbitration Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Public Policy Sanctions Separate Questions Preliminary Hearings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DKB

Claimant

DKC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Application / Summons to Set Aside Leave to Enforce Arbitral Award

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether enforcement of arbitral award is contrary to Singapore public policy due to sanctions
  2. 2 Whether separate questions based on assumptions should be determined before factual inquiry

Ratio Decidendi

It is undesirable to determine proceedings on assumed facts without factual findings, especially when underlying facts are uncertain and legal issues are novel; separate questions should not be ordered.

Court Disposition

application for separate questions refused

Orders

  • no order for separate questions
  • proceedings to continue with factual inquiry