Pacific Harbor Advisors Pte Ltd and another v Tiny Tantono (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased) and another suit

Pacific Harbor Advisors Pte Ltd and another v Tiny Tantono (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased) and another suit

The court held that the EJD is limited to information about the estate's existing property and property which may become available (ie means presently available to the estate); questions about the historical aspect of the deceased's estate are not permitted even if they have a nexus to current assets, and the examination was limited to property from the date of final judgment (28 March 2014) onward.

Citation
[2015] SGHCR 3
Parties
Judgment Creditor: Pacific Harbor Advisors Pte Ltd; Judgment Creditor: LIM Asia Multi-Strategy Fund Inc; Judgment Debtor: Tiny Tantono (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased)
Court
High Court Registrar
Jurisdiction
Singapore
Judgment Date
19 January 2015
Case Number
Suit No 795 of 2012 (Summons No 2527 of 2014) and Suit No 863 of 2012 (Summons No 3387 of 2014)
Procedural Posture
Examination of Judgment Debtor (ejd) Arising From Debt Recovery Proceedings / Examination Hearing (scope of EJD Questions Determined)
Outcome
Judgment creditors were not permitted to ask questions concerning the historical aspect of the deceased's estate; examination limited to property from the date of the final judgment (28 March 2014) onwards.
Legal Topics
Examination of Judgment Debtor, Scope of Questioning, Interpretation of Order 48 Rule 1(1), Historical Assets Vs Present Assets
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pacific Harbor Advisors Pte Ltd

Judgment Creditor

LIM Asia Multi-Strategy Fund Inc

Judgment Creditor

Tiny Tantono (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased)

Judgment Debtor

Procedural Posture

Examination of Judgment Debtor (ejd) Arising From Debt Recovery Proceedings / Examination Hearing (scope of EJD Questions Determined)

  1. 1 Whether a judgment creditor may ask questions about the historical aspect of a deceased judgment debtor's estate during an examination of judgment debtor (EJD)
  2. 2 How Order 48 rule 1(1) of the Rules of Court should be interpreted — whether present-tense wording limits questions to current property or permits inquiry into past assets with a nexus to current property

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the EJD is limited to information about the estate's existing property and property which may become available (ie means presently available to the estate); questions about the historical aspect of the deceased's estate are not permitted even if they have a nexus to current assets, and the examination was limited to property from the date of final judgment (28 March 2014) onward.

Court Disposition

Judgment creditors were not permitted to ask questions concerning the historical aspect of the deceased's estate; examination limited to property from the date of the final judgment (28 March 2014) onwards.

Orders

  • Questions on the historical aspect of the estate disallowed; examination confined to property and means of the estate from 28 March 2014 (date of final judgment) to date.