Suhaidah bte Mohd Noor and another (trustees and executors of the estate of Haji Hassan bin Haji Ismail, deceased) v Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff
Dismissal of originating summons: the affidavits and documents before the court were insufficient to resolve the substantial factual dispute whether all trust documents had been handed over; because a substantial dispute of fact existed the proper procedure was to commence by writ and the court declined to exercise its discretion under O 28 r 8 to treat the summons as a writ; accordingly the originating summons was dismissed but plaintiffs were given liberty to file a fresh writ.
- Citation
- [2014] SGHC 116
- Parties
- Plaintiff Trustee and Executor of the Estate of Haji Hassan Bin Haji Ismail: Suhaidah bte Mohd Noor; Plaintiff Trustee and Executor of the Estate of Haji Hassan Bin Haji Ismail: Sheik Nawaz bin Mohd Fadel; Defendant Former Trustee: Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff
- Court
- General Division of the High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2014
- Case Number
- Originating Summons No 1079 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons No 1079 of 2013 / Judgment (dismissed) 25 June 2014
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' originating summons dismissed; plaintiffs granted liberty to file a fresh writ; costs awarded to defendant on a standard basis to be agreed or taxed
- Legal Topics
- Handover of Trust Documents, Breach of Trust, Enforcement of Settlement Agreement, Originating Summons Versus Writ, Affidavit Evidence Versus Oral Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suhaidah bte Mohd Noor
Plaintiff Trustee and Executor of the Estate of Haji Hassan Bin Haji Ismail
Sheik Nawaz bin Mohd Fadel
Plaintiff Trustee and Executor of the Estate of Haji Hassan Bin Haji Ismail
Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff
Defendant Former Trustee
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons No 1079 of 2013 / Judgment (dismissed) 25 June 2014
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant discharged duty/contractual obligation to hand over all trust documents
- 2 Whether originating summons was the proper procedure or the matter should proceed by writ due to substantial disputes of fact
Ratio Decidendi
Dismissal of originating summons: the affidavits and documents before the court were insufficient to resolve the substantial factual dispute whether all trust documents had been handed over; because a substantial dispute of fact existed the proper procedure was to commence by writ and the court declined to exercise its discretion under O 28 r 8 to treat the summons as a writ; accordingly the originating summons was dismissed but plaintiffs were given liberty to file a fresh writ.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' originating summons dismissed; plaintiffs granted liberty to file a fresh writ; costs awarded to defendant on a standard basis to be agreed or taxed
Orders
- OS 1079/2013 dismissed
- Liberty for plaintiffs to file a fresh writ on the claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment