Mak Seng Fook v Lin Kao Chi and Another

Mak Seng Fook v Lin Kao Chi and Another

The court dismissed the defendants' appeal and upheld the Assistant Registrar's grant of summary judgment because the material facts showed payments were made to the defendants on the first defendant's instructions, a second oral agreement to rescind and refund with 10% interest was made, and the defendants' assertions of agency, breach by purchasers or that payments were loans did not raise a real triable issue to defeat summary judgment.

Citation
[2000] SGHC 42
Parties
Plaintiff: Mak Seng Fook; First Defendant: Lin Kao Chi; Second Defendant: Nam Shing Mechanical Moulds Factory (Private) Limited
Court
General Division of the High Court
Jurisdiction
Singapore
Judgment Date
17 March 2000
Case Number
Suit 1110/1999, Suit 691/1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (summary Judgment) / Appeal Against Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment affirmed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Oral Contract, Rescission, Refund, Payment, Agency (principal/agent)
Source Language
English
Contract Civil Procedure Agency Restitution Summary Judgment Oral Contract Rescission Refund +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mak Seng Fook

Plaintiff

Lin Kao Chi

First Defendant

Nam Shing Mechanical Moulds Factory (Private) Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit (summary Judgment) / Appeal Against Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment under Order 14 r 3 was properly granted
  2. 2 Whether the first defendant acted as principal or as agent for a third party (Tonggi) in the oral agreement
  3. 3 Whether the oral agreement was subject to a written agreement and effect of delay

Ratio Decidendi

The court dismissed the defendants' appeal and upheld the Assistant Registrar's grant of summary judgment because the material facts showed payments were made to the defendants on the first defendant's instructions, a second oral agreement to rescind and refund with 10% interest was made, and the defendants' assertions of agency, breach by purchasers or that payments were loans did not raise a real triable issue to defeat summary judgment.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summary judgment affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Order 14 summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff affirmed