Mercurine Pte Ltd v Canberra Development Pte Ltd

Mercurine Pte Ltd v Canberra Development Pte Ltd

The Court of Appeal held Mercurine’s delay in applying to set aside the Default Judgment was not fatal given settlement negotiations and legitimate explanations; reaffirmed that regular default judgments are to be tested by the Evans v Bartlam (prima facie/arguable or triable issue) standard while irregular default judgments start with the ex debito justitiae rule but, where that is not applied, the plaintiff must show the defendant would be 'bound to lose' (Faircharm) if re-litigation were allowed; applied these principles to conclude the Money Judgment should be amended to $725,116.81 and ordered the Default Judgment to be deemed set aside if Mercurine succeeds in the Consolidated Suit...

Citation
[2008] SGCA 38
Parties
Appellant: Mercurine Pte Ltd; Respondent: Canberra Development Pte Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Singapore
Judgment Date
8 September 2008
Case Number
CA 143/2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Concerning Setting Aside Default Judgment / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; Default Judgment amended and conditionally set aside pending outcome of related proceedings
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Default Judgment, Regular Vs Irregular Default Judgment, Delay in Filing Setting Aside Application, Power to Amend Judgment, Severance of Judgment Parts
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Judgments and Orders Court Practice and Procedure Setting Aside Default Judgment Regular Vs Irregular Default Judgment Delay in Filing Setting Aside Application Power to Amend Judgment Severance of Judgment Parts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mercurine Pte Ltd

Appellant

Canberra Development Pte Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal Concerning Setting Aside Default Judgment / Court of Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Default Judgment was regular or irregular
  2. 2 Applicable merits test for setting aside a regular default judgment
  3. 3 Whether an irregular default judgment must be set aside ex debito justitiae or can be upheld/amended

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held Mercurine’s delay in applying to set aside the Default Judgment was not fatal given settlement negotiations and legitimate explanations; reaffirmed that regular default judgments are to be tested by the Evans v Bartlam (prima facie/arguable or triable issue) standard while irregular default judgments start with the ex debito justitiae rule but, where that is not applied, the plaintiff must show the defendant would be 'bound to lose' (Faircharm) if re-litigation were allowed; applied these principles to conclude the Money Judgment should be amended to $725,116.81 and ordered the Default Judgment to be deemed set aside if Mercurine succeeds in the Consolidated Suit...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; Default Judgment amended and conditionally set aside pending outcome of related proceedings

Orders

  • Default Judgment reduced to S$725,116.81 (money judgment amended)
  • Default Judgment to be deemed set aside if Mercurine succeeds in the Consolidated Suit inclusive of any appeal