Chenet Finance Ltd v Lim Poh Yen (alias Lim Allene) and others and another suit
The Court found the Sale Notice was signed before the Transfer Notices were dispatched and the Transfer Notices were sent on 23 July 2009; the $2.2m figure was known and adopted by Chenet's camp and did not invalidate the Sale Notice; Abu Bakar accepted the Offer in time (Acceptance delivered via Carina to Allene and to company officer by 11 August 2009); however there was no valid contract enforceable in specific performance between Chenet and Abu Bakar because the intended transfer to Hopaco was a sham and there was no genuine offer meant to be acted on by shareholders; unlawful act conspiracy claim failed because the unlawful act (false email dated 18 August 2009) occurred after...
- Citation
- [2012] SGHC 158
- Parties
- Plaintiff (suit 781); Defendant (suit 796): Chenet Finance Ltd; First Defendant: Lim Poh Yen (alias Lim Allene); Second Defendant; Plaintiff (suit 796): Abu Bakar bin Ismail; Third Defendant (nominal): Berlian Ferries Pte Ltd
- Court
- General Division of the High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2012
- Case Number
- Suit No 781 of 2009 consolidated with Suit No 796 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Consolidated Suits: Shareholder Dispute Over Transfer of Shares; Claim for Specific Performance; Claim for Unlawful Act Conspiracy / Trial Judgment on Merits (high Court Decision)
- Outcome
- Judgment for defendants on principal claims: Abu Bakar's claim for specific performance dismissed; Chenet declared legal and beneficial owner of the 24,017,983 shares; Chenet's unlawful act conspiracy claim dismissed; Chenet's claim for items against Allene dismissed (items 1 and 2 previously withdrawn); Allene's...
- Legal Topics
- Share Transfer, Pre Emption Rights Under Articles of Association, Specific Performance, Unlawful Act Conspiracy, Non Est Factum, Unilateral Mistake, Unconscionability, Lifting the Corporate Veil, Abuse of Process, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chenet Finance Ltd
Plaintiff (suit 781); Defendant (suit 796)
Lim Poh Yen (alias Lim Allene)
First Defendant
Abu Bakar bin Ismail
Second Defendant; Plaintiff (suit 796)
Berlian Ferries Pte Ltd
Third Defendant (nominal)
Procedural Posture
Civil Consolidated Suits: Shareholder Dispute Over Transfer of Shares; Claim for Specific Performance; Claim for Unlawful Act Conspiracy / Trial Judgment on Merits (high Court Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 whether there was an unlawful act conspiracy to deprive Chenet of the shares
- 2 whether Articles 22 price mechanism was complied with
- 3 whether allocation notice under Article 22(c) was given appropriately
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the Sale Notice was signed before the Transfer Notices were dispatched and the Transfer Notices were sent on 23 July 2009; the $2.2m figure was known and adopted by Chenet's camp and did not invalidate the Sale Notice; Abu Bakar accepted the Offer in time (Acceptance delivered via Carina to Allene and to company officer by 11 August 2009); however there was no valid contract enforceable in specific performance between Chenet and Abu Bakar because the intended transfer to Hopaco was a sham and there was no genuine offer meant to be acted on by shareholders; unlawful act conspiracy claim failed because the unlawful act (false email dated 18 August 2009) occurred after...
Court Disposition
Judgment for defendants on principal claims: Abu Bakar's claim for specific performance dismissed; Chenet declared legal and beneficial owner of the 24,017,983 shares; Chenet's unlawful act conspiracy claim dismissed; Chenet's claim for items against Allene dismissed (items 1 and 2 previously withdrawn); Allene's...
Orders
- Abu Bakar's claim for specific performance dismissed
- Declaration that Chenet Finance Ltd is the legal and beneficial owner of 24,017,983 shares in Berlian Ferries Pte Ltd
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment