PMA Credit Opportunities Fund and others v Tantono Tiny (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased)
Appellant failed to establish any triable issue; alleged breaches of Indonesian notarial formalities did not automatically invalidate the PG and, on the facts and expert evidence, the PG and spousal consent were enforceable; the allegations of mistake and lack of informed consent were sham, raised late and contradicted by surrounding circumstances; therefore summary judgment was properly granted and the appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2011] SGHC 89
- Parties
- Respondents/plaintiffs: PMA Credit Opportunities Fund and others; Appellant/defendant: Tantono Tiny (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased)
- Court
- General Division of the High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2011
- Case Number
- Suit No 671 of 2009 (Registrar's Appeal No 18 of 2011)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Summary Judgment on Personal Guarantee / Registrar's Appeal From Assistant Registrar's Summary Judgment (ra 18/2011)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Assistant Registrar's summary judgment affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment (o.14), Personal Guarantee, Foreign Law (indonesian Law), Notarial Formalities, Spousal Consent, Mistake, Pleading Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PMA Credit Opportunities Fund and others
Respondents/plaintiffs
Tantono Tiny (representative of the estate of Lim Susanto, deceased)
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Summary Judgment on Personal Guarantee / Registrar's Appeal From Assistant Registrar's Summary Judgment (ra 18/2011)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a defendant challenging an O.14 summary judgment application may rely on unpleaded defences
- 2 Whether the appellant established a triable issue to resist summary judgment
- 3 Whether non-compliance with Indonesian notarial requirements (Law No 30/2004 Arts 43,44) renders the guarantee void under Indonesian law
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant failed to establish any triable issue; alleged breaches of Indonesian notarial formalities did not automatically invalidate the PG and, on the facts and expert evidence, the PG and spousal consent were enforceable; the allegations of mistake and lack of informed consent were sham, raised late and contradicted by surrounding circumstances; therefore summary judgment was properly granted and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Assistant Registrar's summary judgment affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Summary judgment of the Assistant Registrar affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment