XYP v XYQ and 4 other matters
Because the applicant failed to comply with a clear court direction to file a compliant affidavit of foreign law and failed to attend mentions without a valid excuse, the court rightly struck her five applications from the hearing list and denied permission to reinstate them.
- Citation
- [2026] SGFC 19
- Parties
- Applicant: XYP; Respondent: XYQ; Respondent: XYR; Respondent: XYO
- Court
- Family Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2026
- Case Number
- SSP 1440/2025
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Protection Order / Mentions and Striking Off the Hearing List for Non Compliance With Directions
- Outcome
- The mother's five PPO applications remain struck off the hearing list and permission to reinstate is denied.
- Legal Topics
- Personal Protection Order, Striking Off Hearing List, Foreign Law Affidavit, Compliance With Court Directions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XYP
Applicant
XYQ
Respondent
XYR
Respondent
XYO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Protection Order / Mentions and Striking Off the Hearing List for Non Compliance With Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether PPO applications should proceed urgently
- 2 Whether applicant's failure to attend mentions and to file a compliant affidavit of foreign law warranted striking the applications
- 3 Standards for reinstatement of struck applications
Ratio Decidendi
Because the applicant failed to comply with a clear court direction to file a compliant affidavit of foreign law and failed to attend mentions without a valid excuse, the court rightly struck her five applications from the hearing list and denied permission to reinstate them.
Court Disposition
The mother's five PPO applications remain struck off the hearing list and permission to reinstate is denied.
Orders
- The Wife’s five applications shall remain struck off the hearing list.
- Permission to reinstate the Wife’s five applications is denied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment