VIVEK KAPOOR & Anor v ZHANG XIAOSHI
Defendant failed to adduce evidence establishing a prima facie defence; her assertions were unsupported by affidavits or documents and were contradicted by the signed inventory and estate agent's affidavit—therefore the setting aside applications were dismissed and the default judgment maintained subject to a proven adjustment of damages.
- Citation
- [2025] SGMC 24
- Parties
- Claimant: Vivek Kapoor; Claimant: Chawla Richa Mrs Richa Kapoor; Defendant: Zhang Xiaoshi
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Singapore
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2025
- Case Number
- MC/OC 2139/2024 ( MC/SUM 2729/2024,MC/SUM 2743/2024 )
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tenancy / Contract Dispute / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed; Default Judgment varied as to quantum.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Default Judgment, Tenant Obligations, Damages, Inventory, Air Conditioner Maintenance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vivek Kapoor
Claimant
Chawla Richa Mrs Richa Kapoor
Claimant
Zhang Xiaoshi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Tenancy / Contract Dispute / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant established a prima facie defence to set aside a regular default judgment
- 2 Whether alleged verbal agreement to set off deposit against last month's rent was proven
- 3 Whether defendant breached clause 2(d) regarding upkeep and replacement of fixtures and fittings
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant failed to adduce evidence establishing a prima facie defence; her assertions were unsupported by affidavits or documents and were contradicted by the signed inventory and estate agent's affidavit—therefore the setting aside applications were dismissed and the default judgment maintained subject to a proven adjustment of damages.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed; Default Judgment varied as to quantum.
Orders
- The Defendant is to pay to the Claimants damages in the sum of $15,495 (this comprises of the $4,638 April 2023 rental and 1 month interest, $11,657 for repairs and replacements, $6,100 for air-conditioning repairs and replacements, less rental deposit of $6,900).
- The Defendant is to pay to the Claimants costs of this action fixed by the court at $4,500 all-in.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment