2C Projects CC v Labour Recruitment Specialist CC (7000/2007) [2008] ZAKZHC 59 (22 August 2008)
The court found that the architect's final payment certificate dated 7 June 2007, signed by the defendant's authorised agent, constituted a liquid document evidencing an unconditional acknowledgment of indebtedness for the sum claimed. The contract empowered the architect to issue instructions and value variations, and the reconciliation presented by the plaintiff demonstrated that the amount claimed was due after accounting for all payments and adjustments. The non-variation clause did not bar recovery, as the contract expressly provided for variations and escalation. The earlier payment certificate marked 'final' was qualified and did not preclude subsequent adjustment for variations....
- Citation
- [2008] ZAKZHC 59
- Parties
- Plaintiff: 2C Projects CC; Defendant: Labour Recruitment Specialist CC
- Court
- High Courts - Kwazulu Natal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2008
- Case Number
- 7000/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Provisional Sentence Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Provisional sentence granted in favour of the plaintiff.
- Judges
- Ntshangase
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Sentence, Building Contract, Variation Orders, Liquid Document, Contractual Escalation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
2C Projects CC
Plaintiff
Labour Recruitment Specialist CC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Provisional Sentence Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the architect's final payment certificate of 7 June 2007 constitutes a liquid document supporting provisional sentence.
- 2 Whether the defendant is liable for additional amounts arising from variation orders beyond the contract price.
- 3 Whether the non-variation clause in the contract precludes recovery of the claimed amount.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the architect's final payment certificate dated 7 June 2007, signed by the defendant's authorised agent, constituted a liquid document evidencing an unconditional acknowledgment of indebtedness for the sum claimed. The contract empowered the architect to issue instructions and value variations, and the reconciliation presented by the plaintiff demonstrated that the amount claimed was due after accounting for all payments and adjustments. The non-variation clause did not bar recovery, as the contract expressly provided for variations and escalation. The earlier payment certificate marked 'final' was qualified and did not preclude subsequent adjustment for variations....
Court Disposition
Provisional sentence granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Orders
- Provisional sentence is granted with costs in the sum of R524,996.01 with interest thereon at the rate of 8.75% from 12 December 2006 to date of payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment