3 Tenners Properties CC v Trustees for the time being of the Atlantic Seaboard Trust (9478/2008) [2011] ZAWCHC 51 (22 March 2011)
The court held that the oral agreement as pleaded does not constitute a donation, as the plaintiff agreed not to object to the defendant's building plans, negating the element of pure benevolence required for donation. The agreement also does not constitute an exchange under the Alienation of Land Act, as neither party undertook to transfer a thing to the other; rather, each party agreed to abandon a personal right. The right to object to building plans is not an interest in land, and the defendant provided no authority to the contrary. The court found that the amended declaration is not excipiable on every reasonable interpretation and thus dismissed the exception.
- Citation
- [2011] ZAWCHC 51
- Parties
- Plaintiff: 3 Tenners Properties CC; Defendant: Trustees for the time being of the Atlantic Seaboard Trust
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2011
- Case Number
- 9478/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Exception Application / Exception to Amended Declaration
- Outcome
- Defendant's exception dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Cloete
- Legal Topics
- Alienation of Land Act, Servitude Creation, Oral Agreements, Exception Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
3 Tenners Properties CC
Plaintiff
Trustees for the time being of the Atlantic Seaboard Trust
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Exception Application / Exception to Amended Declaration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the oral agreement for the registration of a height restriction servitude constitutes a donation or exchange under the Alienation of Land Act and is thus unenforceable without written form.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's amended declaration discloses a cause of action.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the oral agreement as pleaded does not constitute a donation, as the plaintiff agreed not to object to the defendant's building plans, negating the element of pure benevolence required for donation. The agreement also does not constitute an exchange under the Alienation of Land Act, as neither party undertook to transfer a thing to the other; rather, each party agreed to abandon a personal right. The right to object to building plans is not an interest in land, and the defendant provided no authority to the contrary. The court found that the amended declaration is not excipiable on every reasonable interpretation and thus dismissed the exception.
Court Disposition
Defendant's exception dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The defendant's exception is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment