A M Marais Boerdery Trust v Department of Water Affairs (WT 18/01/2010) [2011] ZAWT 6 (23 November 2011)
The Tribunal found that the undisputed facts and the balancing of all relevant factors, including those set out in section 27(1) of the National Water Act, supported the granting of the water use licence. Both parties agreed that the facts warranted the licence, and the Tribunal was satisfied that the objectives of the Act would be served by granting the application. The refusal of the application would not advance the purposes of section 27(1), and the appellant's engagement in development initiatives for historically disadvantaged individuals further supported the decision. Accordingly, the appeal succeeded and the licence was granted.
- Citation
- [2011] ZAWT 6
- Parties
- Appellant: A M Marais Boerdery Trust; Respondent: Department of Water Affairs
- Court
- Water Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2011
- Case Number
- WT 18/01/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; water use licence granted to the appellant.
- Judges
- LJ Lekale, W Singo, H Thompson
- Legal Topics
- Water Use Licensing, National Water Act, Balancing of Relevant Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A M Marais Boerdery Trust
Appellant
Department of Water Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a water use licence under section 27(1) of the National Water Act.
- 2 Whether all relevant factors have been properly considered and balanced in the application for the licence.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the undisputed facts and the balancing of all relevant factors, including those set out in section 27(1) of the National Water Act, supported the granting of the water use licence. Both parties agreed that the facts warranted the licence, and the Tribunal was satisfied that the objectives of the Act would be served by granting the application. The refusal of the application would not advance the purposes of section 27(1), and the appellant's engagement in development initiatives for historically disadvantaged individuals further supported the decision. Accordingly, the appeal succeeded and the licence was granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; water use licence granted to the appellant.
Orders
- The appellant is granted a water use licence on the respondent's standard terms and conditions applicable to relevant water use licences.
- The respondent shall proceed to issue the relevant licence without delay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment