ABSA Bank Limited v Goolam (2016/8629) [2025] ZAGPJHC 62 (30 January 2025)

ABSA Bank Limited v Goolam (2016/8629) [2025] ZAGPJHC 62 (30 January 2025)

The court held that the settlement agreement between ABSA Bank Limited and Shereen Goolam constituted a credit agreement as defined in section 8(4)(f) of the National Credit Act, since it deferred payment of an amount due and provided for interest. However, the reckless credit provisions of the NCA do not apply to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] ZAGPJHC 62
Parties
Applicant: ABSA Bank Limited; Respondent: Shereen Goolam
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 January 2025
Case Number
2016/8629
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Application for Judgment and Special Execution Order; Counter Application and Supplementary Affidavits Considered
Judges
D Marais
Legal Topics
National Credit Act, Settlement Agreement Novation, Reckless Credit, Section 129 and 130 Nca, Rule 46a Execution, Costs Order Abuse of Process
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure National Credit Act Settlement Agreement Novation Reckless Credit Section 129 and 130 Nca Rule 46a Execution Costs Order Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABSA Bank Limited

Applicant

Shereen Goolam

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Opposed Application for Judgment and Special Execution Order; Counter Application and Supplementary Affidavits Considered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the settlement agreement constitutes a credit agreement under section 8(4)(f) of the National Credit Act.
  2. 2 Whether the reckless credit provisions of the NCA apply to the settlement agreement.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant was obliged to comply with sections 129 and 130 of the NCA before launching the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the settlement agreement between ABSA Bank Limited and Shereen Goolam constituted a credit agreement as defined in section 8(4)(f) of the National Credit Act, since it deferred payment of an amount due and provided for interest. However, the reckless credit provisions of the NCA do not apply to such settlement agreements, as those provisions are intended for the initial granting of credit and not for consensual restructuring of existing debt, unless the settlement increases the consumer's obligations, which was not the case here. The applicant was required to comply with sections 129 and 130 of the NCA before seeking judgment, as the settlement agreement created a new...