ABSA Bank Limited v Phakamole Trading CC and Others (44997/2017) [2019] ZAGPPHC 341 (2 August 2019)
The court held that the order joining the trust as defendants was procedural in nature and not appealable, as it did not dispose of the merits and merely facilitated the proper adjudication of the dispute by preventing multiplicity of actions. The trust retained all available defenses and the opportunity to participate in the proceedings. Even if the order were appealable, the trust failed to demonstrate that the court's discretion was not judicially exercised or that there was any prospect of success on appeal. The public policy argument regarding the suretyship clause was not properly raised in the pleadings and could not be considered at this stage.
- Citation
- [2019] ZAGPPHC 341
- Parties
- Applicant: ABSA Bank Limited; Respondent: Phakamole Trading CC; Respondent: Molebogeng Mbethe; Respondent: Phakama Mpumelelo Nkosi; Respondent: Advent Oil (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mohwelere Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Lazarus Modijane Mbethe NO; Respondent: Sylvia Rassie Mbethe NO; Respondent: Werner Fuls NO
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 August 2019
- Case Number
- 44997/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Joinder Order
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Kruger
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Appealability of Orders, Suretyship, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ABSA Bank Limited
Applicant
Phakamole Trading CC
Respondent
Molebogeng Mbethe
Respondent
Phakama Mpumelelo Nkosi
Respondent
Advent Oil (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Mohwelere Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Lazarus Modijane Mbethe NO
Respondent
Sylvia Rassie Mbethe NO
Respondent
Werner Fuls NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Joinder Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the order joining the trust as defendants appealable?
- 2 Did the court exercise its discretion judicially in granting the joinder?
- 3 Is there any prospect of success on appeal regarding the joinder order?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the order joining the trust as defendants was procedural in nature and not appealable, as it did not dispose of the merits and merely facilitated the proper adjudication of the dispute by preventing multiplicity of actions. The trust retained all available defenses and the opportunity to participate in the proceedings. Even if the order were appealable, the trust failed to demonstrate that the court's discretion was not judicially exercised or that there was any prospect of success on appeal. The public policy argument regarding the suretyship clause was not properly raised in the pleadings and could not be considered at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment