Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Actis Impact Limited and Mco v Impact Holdings (Mauritius S.A.) Limited (LM052May17) [2017] ZACT 17 (11 July 2017)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in any substantial prevention or lessening of competition in any relevant market, as there was no horizontal overlap between the merging parties' activities in South Africa. The Actis Group had no prior investments or operations in the country, and the Improvon Group operated in the industrial and logistics property sector. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no negative impact on employment, with no retrenchments anticipated. No other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Actis Impact Limited, MCo, and Impact Holdings (Mauritius S.A.) Limited is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Actis Impact Limited

Applicant Counsel: Burton Phillips of Webber Wentzel Attorneys

MCo

Applicant Counsel: Burton Phillips of Webber Wentzel Attorneys

Impact Holdings (Mauritius S.A.) Limited

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Approval / Final Determination

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Actis and the Existing Shareholders argued that the transaction would create a joint portfolio of sub-Saharan African industrial and logistics properties, facilitating the continued growth and competitiveness of the Improvon Group. They asserted that there would be no negative impact on employment and no retrenchments resulting from the transaction.
Respondent
The Competition Commission submitted that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging parties, as the Actis Group has no investments or operations in South Africa prior to the transaction. The Commission found no competition or public interest concerns arising from the merger.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations, including effects on employment, must be assessed in merger proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in any substantial prevention or lessening of competition in any relevant market, as there was no horizontal overlap between the merging parties' activities in South Africa. The Actis Group had no prior investments or operations in the country, and the Improvon Group operated in the industrial and logistics property sector. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no negative impact on employment, with no retrenchments anticipated. No other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the merging parties claimed confidentiality over the percentage shareholding in Impact.
  • The Tribunal observed that the transaction would be the Actis Group's first investment in South Africa.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between Actis Impact Limited, MCo, and Impact Holdings (Mauritius S.A.) Limited is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2017] ZACT 17

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: LM052May17

In the matter between:

ACTIS

IMPACT LIMITED AND MCO Acquiring

Firm

and

IMPACT HOLDINGS (MAURITIUS S.A.) LIMITED Target

Firm

Panel

: AW Wessels (Presiding Member)

: M Mazwai (Tribunal Member)

: I Valodia (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

: 14 June 2017

Order Issued on

: 14 June 2017

Reasons Issued on

: 11 July 2017

NON-

CONFIDENTIAL REASONS FOR DECISION

APPROVAL

[1] On 14 June 2017, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") approved the proposed transaction involving Actis Impact Limited

("Actis"), MCo and Impact Holdings (Mauritius S.A.) Limited ("Impact".)

[2] The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to the proposed transaction

Primary Acquiring Firms

[3] The primary acquiring firms are Actis and MCo.

[4] Actis is a newly established private company incorporated in accordance with the laws of Mauritius. Actis is controlled by Actis

Africa Real Estate Fund 3 ("Actis Fund") which is managed by Actis GP LLP. Actis, Actis Fund and Actis GP LLP and any firms managed or advised by these entities are collectively referred to hereinafter as "the Actis Group".

[5] The Actis Group is a global emerging markets private equity investor, generally investing in buy-outs of companies or non-core divisions of large corporations and in private companies seeking to achieve rapid growth organically or through acquisitions, privatisations or restructurings. Actis Fund is a private equity real estate fund targeting property investments in sub-Saharan Africa. However,

pre-merger it does not have any investments or operations in South Africa; the proposed transaction will be its first investment in South Africa.

[6] MCo is yet to be established as a private company to be incorporated in accordance with the laws of Mauritius. MCo will be ultimately

controlled in equal parts by the existing shareholders of the Target Group ("the Existing Shareholders") (see below). The Existing Shareholders consist of private companies and trusts, ultimately controlled by four brothers. The Existing Shareholders

control the lmprovon Group (see below).

Primary Target Firm

[7] The primary target firm is Impact, a special purpose vehicle established for the purpose of the proposed transaction and incorporated in accordance with the laws of Mauritius. It was established as a holding company into which Actis and the Existing Shareholders will invest in order to establish a joint venture comprising certain property assets currently held by the Existing Shareholders.

[8] On completion of the proposed transaction Impact wilt control: lmpro REIT Limited ("lmprovon"), as well as certain entities

holding various property investments which do not form part of the lmprovon Property Companies ("the Out of Fund

Companies")[1] and certain entities which provide a range of property management. construction and development services ("the Operating Companies")[2].

[9] lmprovon controls the following firms: RFC Land Two (Pty) Ltd, Arena Props 9 (Pty) Ltd, lmprovon Growth Fund 1 (Pty) Ltd, lmprovon

Property Fund 1 (Pty) Ltd, lmprovon Property Fund 2 (Pty) Ltd, Black Ginger 248 (Pty) Ltd, Bridoon Trade and Invest 10 (Pty) Ltd and Wavelengths 124 (Pty) Ltd (collectively referred to as "the lmprovon Property Companies").

[10] lmprovon, the lmprovon Property Companies, the Out of Fund Companies and the Operating Companies therefore constitute the target group to be acquired in the proposed transaction ("the Target Group" or "lmprovon Group").

[11] The lmprovon Group is a specialised real estate investment group that is focused on the industrial and logistics property sector of South Africa. Its primary property portfolio comprises of premium industrial and logistics premises located in strategic nodes across South Africa.

PROPOSED

TRANSACTION AND RATIONALE

[12] The proposed transaction involves a series of inter-conditional and indivisible steps, ultimately resulting in the Actis Group and MCo (controlled in equal parts by the Existing Shareholders) each holding [... ][3] shareholding in Impact. The Out of Fund Companies will become subsidiaries of lmprovon and the Operating Companies will be held directly by Impact. The remaining shares in Impact will be held by a management entity which would possess no form of minority control.

[13] In terms of rationale, Actis submitted that the proposed transaction facilitates the creation of a joint portfolio of sub-Saharan African industrial and logistics properties.

[14] The Existing Shareholders submitted that the proposed transaction facilitates the lmprovon Group's continued growth and enhances its competitiveness.

IMPACT

ON COMPETITION

[15] The Competition Commission ("Commission") found no horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging parties.

None of the Actis Group's investments in South Africa overlap with the activities of the lmprovon Group. Although the Actis Group has certain investments in real estate, it does not have any such investments in South Africa.

Public interest

[16] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will have no negative effects on employment and particularly that there will be no retrenchments as a result of the proposed transaction.[4]

[17] No other public interest concerns arise from the proposed transaction.

Conclusion

[18] In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.

11 July 2017

Date

______

Mr AW Wessels

Ms M Mazwai and Prof. I Valodia

Tribunal Case Manager: Alistair Dey-Van Heerden

For the Commission:

Zanele Hadebe

For the Merging Parties: Burton Phillips of Webber Wentzel Attorneys

[1] The Out of Fund Companies are: Cool Ideas 281 (Pty) ltd, Cool Ideas 208 (Pty) Ltd, Dacorp Park Properties (Pty) ltd and Repo Wild 89 (Pty) Ltd.

[2] The Operating Companies are: lmprovon Property Projects (Pty) Ltd, lmperio (Pty) Ltd and Improvon Properties (Pty) Ltd.

[3] The merging parties have claimed confidentiality over the percentage shareholding.

[4] Merger Record, pages 12, 20 and 109.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.