Adams v Makhoye (2974/2019) [2023] ZANWHC 142 (17 August 2023)

Adams v Makhoye (2974/2019) [2023] ZANWHC 142 (17 August 2023)

The court found that the defendant published a defamatory statement about the plaintiff by sending an email accusing him of infidelity with a junior officer. The statement was objectively defamatory and concerned the plaintiff, who was the only 'General Adams' at the relevant police station. The publication was wrongful and intentional, and the defendant failed to rebut the presumptions by not defending the action. The court accepted that the defamatory statement harmed the plaintiff's reputation, dignity, and confidence, although the extent of publication was limited. In assessing quantum, the court considered the plaintiff's untainted career, the seriousness of the allegation, and...

Citation
[2023] ZANWHC 142
Parties
Plaintiff: A P Adams; Defendant: L Makhoye
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 August 2023
Case Number
2974/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Action / Default Judgment on Merits and Quantum
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant held liable for defamation and ordered to pay damages and costs.
Judges
Gura
Legal Topics
Defamation, Quantification of Damages, Publication, Reputation, Onus of Proof
Delict Defamation Quantification of Damages Publication Reputation Onus of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A P Adams

Plaintiff

L Makhoye

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Action / Default Judgment on Merits and Quantum

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant published a defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the publication was wrongful and intentional.
  3. 3 What quantum of damages is appropriate for the defamation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant published a defamatory statement about the plaintiff by sending an email accusing him of infidelity with a junior officer. The statement was objectively defamatory and concerned the plaintiff, who was the only 'General Adams' at the relevant police station. The publication was wrongful and intentional, and the defendant failed to rebut the presumptions by not defending the action. The court accepted that the defamatory statement harmed the plaintiff's reputation, dignity, and confidence, although the extent of publication was limited. In assessing quantum, the court considered the plaintiff's untainted career, the seriousness of the allegation, and...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant held liable for defamation and ordered to pay damages and costs.

Orders

  • The defendant is delictually liable to the plaintiff for defamation.
  • The defendant must pay damages to the plaintiff in the amount of R230,000.